TD Bank Financial Group
Home  |  Search  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy  |  Security
  
   About TDBFG   Investor Relations   Economics   Careers   Corporate Responsibility   To Our Customers 
   Analysis      Forecasts      Presentations      About TD Economics  
  Canada
  U.S. & International
  Interest Rates & Exchange Rates


Data Commentaries

FOMC CUTS THE FED FUNDS RATE BY 25BPS AND LEAVES NEUTRAL BIAS

April 30, 2008

  • The FOMC cut the fed funds rate by 25bps to 2%. Discount rate was cut by 25bps also, to 2.25%
  • The vote was 8-2, with dissent from Fed Presidents Fisher and Plosser.
  • The statement highlighted ongoing weakness in the economy but left out any mention of forward looking action.

As widely expected the FOMC cut the fed funds rate by 25bps to 2% today. The vote was close but there were two dissenters similar to the last meeting. They were Dallas Fed President Fisher and Philadelphia Fed President Plosser, both noted inflation hawks who dissented at the March 18 meeting.

Given that the rate cut was largely priced in, the focus was really on what the Fed said in the statement. The economic assessment was not quite as bad as feared. There is still a good deal of softness in the U.S. economy with household and business spending remaining "subdued." In addition, labour markets "have softened further." Moreover, the Fed mentioned that "financial markets remain under considerable stress," which comes as little surprise. The housing contraction is also presumed to remain a drag on growth going forward.

On the inflation front, there was a small surprise in that the Fed noted that "readings on core inflation have improved somewhat." However, they acknowledge that "energy and other commodity prices have increased and some indicators of inflation expectations have risen in recent months." Recent price trends in energy and food have probably been fodder for the two inflation hawks, like Plosser and Fisher, and were clearly bolstering their view for dissent.

With respect to the bias, the Fed was uncharacteristically mum about the matter. The interpretation of this statement suggests that the hawks may be growing in fortitude, in that they do not make any mention of downside risk. Moreover, their lack of explicit bias suggests that the Fed is neither signalling another rate cut going forward, but by not mentioning a bias, they are leaving the door open for another cut, should it become necessary.

Looking ahead, we continue to expect the Fed to deliver an additional 75bps of rate cuts, based upon our below consensus economic view. The way the Fed details the weakness in the economy suggests scope for a bit more monetary stimulus, but there is clearly a need to see how the balance of risks between growth and inflation unfold.

Charmaine Buskas
Senior Economics Strategist
TD Securities

For further information, contact Beata Caranci at 416-982-8067.


For PDF format click here.



Current Publications
Daily Financial Indicators*
Weekly Financial Indicators*
Daily Economic Indicators*
Weekly Bottom Line*
Weekly Commodity Price Report*
Revised Economic Forecasts*
Quarterly Economic Forecast*
Quarterly Commodity Price Report*
Global Markets*
Provincial Economic Outlook*
Industrial Outlook*
Federal & Provincial Budgets

Special Reports
A Different Look At Canadian Home Prices*
The Low Down on a Low Fed Funds Rate*
Can Equities Recover?*
Chinese Fiscal Stimulus Can’t Buy Happiness*
2009 Prospects for Canadian Agriculture*
The ECB, the BoE, and the Growing European Recession*
Presidents, The Economy and Financial Markets*
Choosing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policies in Canada*
2009 To Prove Testing Times For Small Businesses*
Origins and Policy Response to the Credit Crunch in North America*
Canada's Federal Government Facing Significant Deficits*
The Anatomy of the Canadian Job Market*
Time For A Vision Of Ontario’s Economy*
Will the U.S. Dollar go the way of the British Pound?*
Natural Gas Outlook: The Calm After The Storm?*
Nausea, Heartburn, Indigestion, Upset Stomach, Fannie, Freddie*
A Look at U.S. Home Prices from 2002 to Now – The Correction Isn’t Over*