Carney’s central thesis was unmistakable: the global rules-based order that Western policymakers long borrowed from textbooks is breaking apart. What replaces it is not a seamless successor, but a “rupture”, a world of intensifying great-power rivalry where economic tools become geopolitical weapons, where alliances shift, and where middle powers must choose between strategic independence or irrelevance.

This is not the wistful vision of gradual change. This is the declaration of an economic epoch in motion.

The End of the Nice Story

For decades, global investors could assume certain things: U.S. leadership, multilateral institutions holding the seams together, and rules that, while imperfect, provided stability. Canada, like many nations, anchored its trade and investment orientation on these assumptions. But as Carney pronounced in Davos, “nostalgia is not a strategy.” In blunt terms, he declared that the old order sustained by a U.S.-centric architecture, is not coming back.

This was no abstract lamentation; it was a geopolitical jolt intended to wake both markets and policymakers. Indeed, Carney’s framing, a rupture, not a transition, suggests that the day of passive adherence to past architectures is over. The question for Canada’s economy, and for investors watching north of the 49th parallel, is what comes next.

From Ally to Independent Actor

Carney’s comments reverberated in a decidedly unflattering political echo from the U.S. President Trump, in a riposte that highlighted rising tensions, quipped that “Canada lives because of the U.S.” He challenged Canadian assertions of independence with a provocation that underscored a U.S. willingness to wield power unilaterally.

This diplomatic friction mirrors deeper structural reality: Canada’s heavy economic reliance on the U.S. has been both a strength and a strategic limitation. Under Carney’s leadership, Ottawa seems intent on turning that limitation into a diversification imperative, not just of markets, but of strategic partners.

China: From Estranged to Strategic Partner

Only weeks before Davos, Carney concluded a landmark trade agreement with China, resetting a bilateral relationship that had been strained for years. After almost a decade of diplomatic friction, Canada agreed to dramatically lower tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EV), reducing duties from punitive levels to a manageable 6.1% for up to 49,000 units annually. In exchange, China agreed to lift steep tariffs on Canadian canola, beef, and other agricultural exports.

This move is not just about goods crossing borders, it signals a strategic pivot. Beijing has welcomed renewed agricultural access and energy collaboration, while Canadian producers are now eyeing a market that was once closed off entirely. For investors, this opens two distinct narratives:

Export Diversification and Sectoral Shifts: Canada’s agricultural sector, from canola to beef, gains incremental access to one of the world’s largest consumer markets. Over time, this could underpin stronger commodity pricing power and justify deeper capital allocation into agri-related equities and infrastructure.

Capital Flows into EV and Clean Tech Supply Chains: The tariff reduction on Chinese EVs could help fuel investment synergies in clean technology. Chinese manufacturers have scale and capital; paired with Canadian resources and R&D ecosystems, this union may give rise to a new suite of cross-border ventures, albeit with careful attention to national security and industrial policy.

Yet this rapprochement is not without controversy. Critics, especially in Ontario’s manufacturing heartland, warn that lower tariffs for foreign EVs could squeeze domestic producers. Investors will need to tease apart transitional volatility from structural growth opportunities.

Middle Powers and Multilateral Reinvention

Carney’s challenge to the old-world order is rooted in the idea that “middle powers”, countries with economic heft but not superpower status, must band together. His plea is not for isolationism, but for coalitions of autonomy. Instead of waiting for global governance to return to a bygone era, Carney argues that nations like Canada, Germany, Japan, and others must forge flexible, issue-based alliances.

For the Canadian economy, this translates into a multi-pronged engagement strategy:

• Deepening ties with the European Union, likely through enhanced services trade, shared regulatory frameworks, and co-investment in green technologies
• Forging issue-by-issue partnerships with other middle powers, focused on pragmatic cooperation where interests align rather than inherited alliances
• Building resilience in supply chains, particularly in critical minerals, semiconductors, energy, and food systems, sectors where Canada has intrinsic advantages

The investment implication is clear: global beta is no longer passive. Strategic portfolios must internalize that Canada’s economic destiny is tied less to a singular hegemon and more to a web of connections that spans multiple geopolitical vectors.

Rupture, Risk, and Opportunity

Carney’s speech recognized a paradox: opportunity and risk are inextricably linked. A world in rupture is unpredictable, but it also rewards actors who can navigate the seams. For Canada, the dual pursuit of sovereignty and cooperation may unlock avenues previously obscured by over-dependence on U.S. trade and monetary systems.

From an asset allocation perspective, this changing terrain should prompt investors to reassess traditional correlations. For example:

Equity Markets: Canadian equities may benefit from increased export trajectories into Asia and Europe. However, sectors like autos may face headwinds if protective tariffs are relaxed in favour of supply chain integration with China.

Fixed Income: for global sovereign bonds, Inflation volatility is likely to rise in a fragmented world order, reducing the defensive value of global sovereign bonds and arguing for structurally higher yields.

Commodities and the Canadian Dollar: A focus on domestic growth drivers, oil, gas, nuclear power, critical minerals, ports, and transportation, supports a higher neutral rate and a stronger Canadian dollar over time.

But risk has risen too. A more fragmented world order brings geopolitical premiums into pricing models. Canadian assets exposed to U.S. policy shifts, Chinese market dynamics, or European regulatory swings will exhibit higher dispersion.

Canada’s Strategic Autonomy as an Investment Thesis

Carney’s call to action —for middle powers to shape a new multipolar order — hints at an emerging investment thesis: strategic autonomy as alpha generation. This is not a catchphrase but a guiding principle that blends geopolitics with economic fundamentals. The realities of this include:

• A de-risked U.S. exposure diminishes dependency on one policy regime and one economic trajectory
• A broader portfolio of trade partners stabilizes export revenues and mitigates bilateral shocks
• Sectors tied to oil, gas, nuclear power, value-added agriculture, and advanced manufacturing gain visibility as durable growth engines

For institutional investors, this moment calls for capital repatriation. After exporting capital for more than a decade, domestic allocations sit near historic lows. The opportunity is here, in front of us - today.

The Future is Being Written Now

In Davos, the world watched as Carney drew a line: the old-world order is ending, not evolving. His speech was part blueprint, part declaration of intent, a bold statement from a nation that has long balanced ideals with pragmatism. Canada’s new trade relations, such as the reset with China, are not just economic transactions; they are strategic moves in a game where rules are being rewritten in real time.

For investors, the question is not whether this new order is desirable, it is already emerging. The real challenge is understanding how to position portfolios for a multipolar economy where trade corridors, alliances, and capital flows are fluid and dynamic.

In a world of rupture, those who can discern structural shifts beneath headline noise will find the greatest opportunities. Canada’s journey toward strategic autonomy may well be a case study in that larger story, one where risk and reward are inseparable, and where the future of investment returns is as geopolitical as it is financial.

For Canadian institutional investors only. The information contained herein is for information purposes only. The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice.

Particular investment, tax or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance. This material is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. These materials have not been reviewed by and are not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority in jurisdictions where we operate.

Any general discussion or opinions contained within these materials regarding securities or market conditions represent our view or the view of the source cited. Unless otherwise indicated, such view is as of the date noted and is subject to change. Information about the portfolio holdings, asset allocation or diversification is historical and is subject to change. This document may contain forward-looking statements (“FLS”). FLS reflect current expectations and projections about future events and/or outcomes based on data currently available. Such expectations and projections may be incorrect in the future as events which were not anticipated or considered in their formulation may occur and lead to results that differ materially from those expressed or implied. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and reliance on FLS should be avoided.

TD Global Investment Solutions represents TD Asset Management Inc. (“TDAM”) and Epoch Investment Partners, Inc. (“TD Epoch”).

TDAM and TD Epoch are affiliates and wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Toronto-Dominion Bank.